Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210512203027.sh6p72zrpmf3ekbr@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2021-05-12 16:18:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Even if we did change the rule going forward, you'd still need to > do it properly for existing releases, so I don't see that you're > going to save anything. It turns out that the last time a major version didn't have a unique control file version was 9.5, I assume that's where David is coming from. That said, I don't think it's a good practice to use the control file version as an identifier for the major version. Who knows, it might be necessary to add an optional new format in a minor version at some point or such crazyness. And then there's the beta stuff you'd mentioned, etc. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: