Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alvaro Herrera
Тема Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up
Дата
Msg-id 20210507192334.GA9670@alvherre.pgsql
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Draft back-branch release notes are up  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Draft back-branch release notes are up  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2021-May-07, Tom Lane wrote:

> See
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=7f4bab7f4a0e42ee9fa14707f726017b7869386b

I suppose you're aware of this, so I just want to get it on record that
this entry

+<!--
+Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
+Branch: master [25936fd46] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+Branch: REL_13_STABLE [2688852a4] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+Branch: REL_12_STABLE [262eb990c] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+Branch: REL_11_STABLE [d1c6edd31] 2021-02-27 18:09:15 -0300
+-->
+     <para>
+      Fix use-after-free bug in saving tuples for <literal>AFTER</literal>
+      triggers (Amit Langote)
+     </para>

only goes back to 12; the commit to 11 was just to add the test case.
This is obvious if you look at the commit, but if you just look at the
release note entry, that detail might be missed.

The notes look good.

Thanks,

-- 
Álvaro Herrera       Valdivia, Chile
"No renuncies a nada. No te aferres a nada."



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plan with result cache is very slow when work_mem is not enough
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender