Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210421134640.GB11327@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google) (Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ML-based indexing ("The Case for Learned Index Structures", a paper from Google)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:52:19AM +0200, Stefan Keller wrote: > Di., 20. Apr. 2021 23:50 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > There's enough support these days that you can build a new index > > type as an extension, without touching the core code at all. > > Thanks. I'm ramping up knowledge about extending PG with C++. > > I'm still interested to understand in principle what an index has to > do with concurrency control, in order to divide > concerns/reponsibilities of code. The issue is that some index structures, like bitmap indexes, have very poor concurrent performance. This means that some indexes perform very well for a single user but poorly for multiple users. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com If only the physical world exists, free will is an illusion.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: