Re: libpq debug log
От | 'alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org' |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq debug log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210329030258.GA25869@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: libpq debug log ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: libpq debug log
RE: libpq debug log |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021-Mar-29, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com wrote: > > (Hey, what the heck is that "Z" at the end of the message? I thought > > the error ended right at the \x00 ...) > > We'll investigate these issues. For what it's worth, I did fix this problem in patch 0005 that I attached. The problem was that one "continue" should have been "break", and also a "while ( .. )" needed to be made an infinite loop. It was easy to catch these problems once I added (in 0006) the check that the bytes consumed equal message length, as I had suggested a couple of weeks ago :-) I also changed the code for Notice, but I didn't actually verify that one. > > 2. The < and > characters are not good for visual inspection. I > > replaced them with F and B and I think it's much clearer. Compare: > > I think the second one is much easier on the eye. > > Yes, agreed. I too thought of something like "C->S" and "S->C" > because client and server should be more familiar for users than > frontend and backend. Hmm, yeah, that's a reasonable option too. What do others think? -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: