Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking
| От | Andres Freund |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20210317181531.7oggpqevzz6bka3g@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: Getting better results from valgrind leak tracking
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, (really need to fix my mobile phone mail program to keep the CC list...) On 2021-03-17 08:15:43 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, at 07:16, Tom Lane wrote: > > Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > > > On 2021-03-16 20:50:17 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > Meanwhile, I'm still trying to understand why valgrind is whining > > about the rd_indexcxt identifier strings. AFAICS it shouldn't. > > I found a way around that late last night. Need to mark the context > itself as an allocation. But I made a mess on the way to that and need > to clean the patch up before sending it (and need to drop my > girlfriend off first). Unfortunately I didn't immediately find a way to do this while keeping the MEMPOOL_CREATE/DESTROY in mcxt.c. The attached patch moves the pool creation into the memory context implementations, "allocates" the context itself as part of that pool, and changes the reset implementation from MEMPOOL_DESTROY + MEMPOOL_CREATE to instead do MEMPOOL_TRIM. That leaves the memory context itself valid (and thus tracking ->ident etc), but marks all the other memory as freed. This is just a first version, it probably needs more work, and definitely a few comments... After this, your changes, and the previously mentioned fixes, I get far fewer false positives. Also found a crash / memory leak in pgstat.c due to the new replication slot stats, but I'll start a separate thread. There are a few leak warnings around guc.c that look like they might be real, not false positives, and thus a bit concerning. Looks like several guc check hooks don't bother to free the old *extra before allocating a new one. I suspect we might get better results from valgrind, not just for leaks but also undefined value tracking, if we changed the way we represent pools to utilize VALGRIND_MEMPOOL_METAPOOL | VALGRIND_MEMPOOL_AUTO_FREE. E.g. aset.c would associate AllocBlock using VALGRIND_MEMPOOL_ALLOC and then mcxt.c would use VALGRIND_MALLOCLIKE_BLOCK for the individual chunk allocation. https://www.valgrind.org/docs/manual/mc-manual.html#mc-manual.mempools I played with naming the allocations underlying aset.c using VALGRIND_CREATE_BLOCK(block, strlen(context->name), context->name). That does produce better undefined-value warnings, but it seems that e.g. the leak detector doen't have that information around. Nor does it seem to be usable for use-afte-free. At least the latter likely because I had to VALGRIND_DISCARD by that point... Greetings, Andres Freund
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: