Re: PostgreSQL Replication
От | Peter J. Holzer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL Replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210219173545.GF10464@hjp.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL Replication (Mutuku Ndeti <jnmutuku@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 2021-02-17 12:22:50 +0300, Mutuku Ndeti wrote: > I agree with you. Single master, with a standby replica, seems easier to > manage. Is there a way to automatically promote the standby, when the active > master fails? Yes. There are several solutions. We use Patroni, which is simple to set up and seems to "just work" (we routinely cause a failover every few weeks and so far it has always worked fine). Patroni is quite postgres-specific, though, so if you want to manage other applications, too, you may want to look into more generic solutions. > Is it feasible to have 2 instances of the application, writing onto > the same DB, reason for two instances of the application is to allow > for redundancy/load balancing. You can have any number of applications writing into the same database. At some point you might exceed the capacity of your hardware, but that's a function of load in general, not the number of applications. hp -- _ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality. |_|_) | | | | | hjp@hjp.at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing __/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: