Re: libpq debug log
От | 'Alvaro Herrera' |
---|---|
Тема | Re: libpq debug log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20210122133820.GA12162@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: libpq debug log ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: libpq debug log
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, just two quick comments on this, On 2021-Jan-22, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com wrote: > From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> > > That's true, but it'd require that we move PQtrace() to fe-misc.c, because > > pqTraceInit() uses definitions that are private to that file. > > Ah, that was the reason for separation. Then, I'm fine with either > keeping the separation, or integrating the two functions in fe-misc.c > with PQuntrace() being also there. I kind of think the latter is > better, because of code readability and, because tracing facility is > not a connection-related reature so categorizing it as "misc" feels > natural. Maybe we can create a new file specifically for this to avoid mixing unrelated stuff in fe-misc.c -- say fe-trace.c where all this new tracing stuff goes. > > The point is to be able to cope with a connection that calls PQtrace() multiple > > times, with or without an intervening PQuntrace(). > > We'd make no friends if we made PQtrace() crash, or leak memory if called a > > second time ... > > HEAD's PQtrace() always call PQuntrace() and then re-initialize from > scratch. So, if we keep that flow, the user can call PQtrace() > multiple in a row. Oh, of course. -- Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile "No necesitamos banderas No reconocemos fronteras" (Jorge González)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: