Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201228191428.p5bhcvd4ixsuyifd@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Better client reporting for "immediate stop" shutdowns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2020-12-28 13:25:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > The most straightforward way to do that is to introduce a new error > level. Having to renumber existing levels is a bit of a pain, but > I'm not aware of anything that should break in source-code terms. > We make similar ABI breaks in every major release. I don't see a problem either. > /* Select default errcode based on elevel */ > if (elevel >= ERROR) > edata->sqlerrcode = ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR; > - else if (elevel == WARNING) > + else if (elevel >= WARNING) > edata->sqlerrcode = ERRCODE_WARNING; > else > edata->sqlerrcode = ERRCODE_SUCCESSFUL_COMPLETION; > @@ -2152,6 +2157,7 @@ write_eventlog(int level, const char *line, int len) > eventlevel = EVENTLOG_INFORMATION_TYPE; > break; > case WARNING: > + case WARNING_CLIENT_ONLY: > eventlevel = EVENTLOG_WARNING_TYPE; > break; > case ERROR: > [...] I don't think it needs to be done right now, but I again want to suggest it'd be nice if we split log levels into a bitmask. If we bits, separate from the log level, for do-not-log-to-client and do-not-log-to-server some of this code would imo look nicer. Looks good to me. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: