Re: Wrong comment in tuptable.h
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Wrong comment in tuptable.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201227034314.vhci7a2u5talg6zq@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Wrong comment in tuptable.h (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2020-12-26 18:00:49 -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > /* > * Return a copy of heap tuple representing the contents of the slot. > The > * copy needs to be palloc'd in the current memory context. The slot > * itself is expected to remain unaffected. It is *not* expected to > have > * meaningful "system columns" in the copy. The copy is not be > "owned" by > * the slot i.e. the caller has to take responsibility to free memory > * consumed by the slot. > */ > HeapTuple (*copy_heap_tuple) (TupleTableSlot *slot); > > But acquire_sample_rows() calls ExecCopySlotHeapTuple(), and then > subsequently sorts the rows by TID. Is acquire_sample_rows() doing > something it shouldn't, or is the comment mistaken? I think the comment is too vague and thinking of system columns as xmin/xmax/cmin/cmax. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: