Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201224004922.GB13055@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Trusted versus untrusted Pl language
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 07:38:16PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com> writes: > > 3. An example of how to make a pre-installed untrusted langue into a > > trusted language > > Under what circumstances would that be a good idea? > > I can't imagine that we'd really want to recommend end users doing > that, but an example would surely be taken as a recommendation > that it's okay to do it. Right. The language has to provide some sandbox environment for us to consider it safe, e.g. Perl, but not Python. PL/pgSQL is safe since it doesn't have any interface to external resources. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: