Re: Proposed patch for key managment
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201221214434.GL28841@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed patch for key managment (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed patch for key managment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:38:55PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > I'll have a go at adding another keyring and/or abstracting the key > > wrap and see how well a true peer to the passphrase approach fits in. > > Having patches to review and consider definitely helps, imv. I disagree. Our order is: Desirability -> Design -> Implement -> Test -> Review -> Commit https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Development_Process so, by posting a patch, you are decided to skip the first _two_ requirements. I think it might be time for me to create a new thread so it is not confused by whatever is posted here. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: