Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201210.104106.998872449268665689.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist
Re: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
At Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:27:30 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 6:32 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > At Tue, 8 Dec 2020 16:28:41 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in > > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 12:13 PM tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com > > > <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Jamison, Kirk/ジャミソン カーク <k.jamison@fujitsu.com> > > > > > Because one of the rel's cached value was false, it forced the > > > > > full-scan path for TRUNCATE. > > > > > Is there a possible workaround for this? > > > > > > > > Hmm, the other two relfilenodes are for the TOAST table and index of the target table. I think the INSERT didn'taccess those TOAST relfilenodes because the inserted data was stored in the main storage. But TRUNCATE always truncatesall the three relfilenodes. So, the standby had not opened the relfilenode for the TOAST stuff or cached its sizewhen replaying the TRUNCATE. > > > > > > > > I'm afraid this is more common than we can ignore and accept the slow traditional path, but I don't think of a goodidea to use the cached flag. > > > > > > > > > > I also can't think of a way to use an optimized path for such cases > > > but I don't agree with your comment on if it is common enough that we > > > leave this optimization entirely for the truncate path. > > > > Mmm. At least btree doesn't need to call smgrnblocks except at > > expansion, so we cannot get to the optimized path in major cases of > > truncation involving btree (and/or maybe other indexes). > > > > AFAICS, btree insert should call smgrnblocks via > btree_xlog_insert->XLogReadBufferForRedo->XLogReadBufferForRedoExtended->XLogReadBufferExtended->smgrnblocks. > Similarly delete should also call smgrnblocks. Can you be bit more > specific related to the btree case you have in mind? Oh, sorry. I wrongly looked to non-recovery path. smgrnblocks is called during buffer loading while recovery. So, smgrnblock is called for indexes if any update happens on the heap relation. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: