Re: Proposed patch for key managment
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201207044612.GB12952@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposed patch for key managment (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 11:03:30AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 10:42:05AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 09:54:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 10:52:29PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >>> if (state->evpctx == NULL) > >>> { > >>> - explicit_bzero(state, sizeof(pg_cryptohash_state)); > >>> - explicit_bzero(ctx, sizeof(pg_cryptohash_ctx)); > >>> #ifndef FRONTEND > >>> ereport(ERROR, > >>> (errcode(ERRCODE_OUT_OF_MEMORY), > >> > >> And this original position is IMO more correct. > > > > Do we even need them? > > That's the intention to clean up things in a consistent way. Ah, I see your point. Added: https://github.com/postgres/postgres/compare/master...bmomjian:key.diff -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: