On 2020-Nov-23, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> > Well, we already do this in a number of places. But I can get behind
> > this:
>
> >> Maybe it'd be a good idea to have elog.c expose a new function
> >> along the lines of "bool message_level_is_interesting(int elevel)"
> >> to support this and similar future optimizations in a less fragile way.
>
> I'll see about a patch for that.
Looking at that now ...