Re: BUG #16707: Memory leak
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16707: Memory leak |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201110193517.t5hbqkya67gb23rq@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16707: Memory leak (Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16707: Memory leak
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, On 2020-11-10 09:11:20 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 08:31:27PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote: > > As this is on a halfway recent linux, I suggest doing something like > > > > $ grep ^Rss /proc/$pid/status > > RssAnon: 6664 kB > > RssFile: 69512 kB > > RssShmem: 15788 kB > > RssAnon: 1197064 kB > RssFile: 27420 kB > RssShmem: 4248052 kB Ok, so it's actual allocations that are the problem. What kind of queries is this workload running? There's one known (slow) memory leak in the JIT code / LLVM. Could you check if the issue vanishes if you disable JIT (jit = 0)? Otherwise it might be useful to collect stack traces for memory allocations. You could try something like 'heaptrack' or add a perf probe on malloc, and do a perf profile. E.g. something like perf probe -x /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 -a malloc perf record -e probe_libc:malloc --call-graph dwarf -p $pid_of_problematic_process Regards, Andres
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: