Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201015203026.6hi2ex4rmbvzssef@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical replication CPU-bound with TRUNCATE/DROP/CREATE many tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-10-15 12:38:49 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:51 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:12 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the tests. The latest patch looks mostly good to me. I have > > > made minor changes to the patch (a) changed the order where the new > > > message is placed at one place to make it consistent with other > > > places, (b) as discussed offlist, removed the extra increment to a > > > local variable in ReorderBufferRestoreChange, (c) ran pgindent. > > > > > > See the attached and let me know what do you think? > > > > The changes look good to me. > > > > Pushed! Awesome - it's great to see this problem finally addressed!
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: