Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for deadlock detection and resolution.
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for deadlock detection and resolution. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20201.1455210279@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for deadlock detection and resolution. (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for
deadlock detection and resolution.
Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add some isolation tests for deadlock detection and resolution. |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > No, because the machines that are failing are showing a "<waiting ...>" > annotation that your reference output *doesn't* have. I think what is > actually happening is that these machines are seeing the process as > waiting and reporting it, whereas on your machine the backend detects > the deadlock and completes the query (with an error) before > isolationtester realizes that the process is waiting. I confirmed this theory by the expedient of changing the '10ms' setting in the test script to 1ms (which worked) and 100ms (which did not, on the same machine). I've committed an update that adjusts the timeouts to hopefully ensure that isolationtester always sees the query as blocked before the deadlock detector unblocks it; which seems like the behavior we want to test for, anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: