Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200930190534.GF26841@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16419: wrong parsing BC year in to_date() function
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:50:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:11:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Hm, I read your reference to "the release notes" as suggesting that > >> we should change it only in a major release, ie HEAD only (and it > >> looks like David read it the same). If you meant minor release notes, > >> then we're on the same page. > > > Yes, I was thinking just the major release notes. What are you > > suggesting, and what did you ultimately decide to do? What I didn't > > want to do was to document the old behavior in the old docs and change > > it in PG 14. > > Actually, I was just finishing up back-patching the patch I posted > yesterday. I think we should just fix it, not document that it's > broken. Agreed, that's what I wanted. You stated in a later email you couldn't convince yourself of the backpatch, which is why I asked. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: