Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200921190804.GA2817@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgindent vs dtrace on macos
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Sep-21, Tom Lane wrote: > Oh wait, I forgot about the fmgrprotos.h discrepancy. > > I wrote: > > It strikes me that a low-cost workaround would be to rename these > > C functions. There's no law that their C names must match the > > SQL names. > > Here's a proposed patch to fix it that way. pgtypes_numeric.h still contains typedef struct { int ndigits; /* number of digits in digits[] - can be 0! */ int weight; /* weight of first digit */ int rscale; /* result scale */ int dscale; /* display scale */ int sign; /* NUMERIC_POS, NUMERIC_NEG, or NUMERIC_NAN */ NumericDigit *buf; /* start of alloc'd space for digits[] */ NumericDigit *digits; /* decimal digits */ } numeric; ... isn't this more likely to create a typedef entry than merely a function name? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: