Making index_set_state_flags() transactional
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Making index_set_state_flags() transactional |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200903080440.GA8559@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Making index_set_state_flags() transactional
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all, For a couple of things I looked at lately, it would be really useful to make index_state_set_flags() transactional and replace its use of heap_inplace_update() by CatalogTupleUpdate(): - When dropping an index used in a replica identity, we could make the reset of relreplident for the parent table consistent with the moment the index is marked as invalid: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200831062304.GA6555@paquier.xyz - In order to make CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY work for partitioned tables, we need to be able to switch indisvalid for all the index partitions in one final transaction so as we have a consistent partition tree at any state of the operation. Obviously, heap_inplace_update() is a problem here. The restriction we have in place now can be lifted thanks to 813fb03, that removed SnapshotNow, and as far as I looked at the code paths doing scans of pg_index, I don't see any reasons why we could not make this stuff transactional. Perhaps that's just because nobody had use cases where it would be useful, and I have two of them lately. Note that 3c84046 was the original commit that introduced the use of heap_inplace_update() and index_state_set_flags(), but we don't have SnapshotNow anymore. Note as well that we already make the index swapping transactional in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY for the pg_index entries. I got the feeling that this is an issue different than the other threads where this was discussed, which is why I am beginning a new thread. Any thoughts? Attached is a proposal of patch. Thanks, -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: