Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200902131858.GD13613@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string (Oleksandr Shulgin <oleksandr.shulgin@zalando.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16486: Prompted password is ignored when password specified in connection string
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 09:54:37AM +0200, Oleksandr Shulgin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 10:38 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > I used a later version of Tom's patch to add documentation of how > connection strings can override command-line options, plus it has the > password description improvements. > > I would like to apply this to all supported versions. > > > Not related to the proposed change, this sentence is the same before and after, > but makes me wonder: > > > However, <application>psql</application> > will waste a connection attempt finding out that the server wants a > password. In some cases it is worth typing <option>-W</option> to > avoid > the extra connection attempt. > > AFAIK, there is nothing in the protocol that forces psql to make an extra > connection attempt. If libpq provided a means to pass a password-prompt > callback, no extra connection would be needed I think? That is true. I don't think we want the backend to be kept open waiting for someone to type a password, which is why, I think, we don't do it that way. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: