Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message.

On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 08:22:42AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, adding that to RemoveRelations() makes sense.  Thanks for the
> patch.

I got some room to test the patch, and the place of the check looks
good to me.  I think that I would move the new check before we set
PERFORM_DELETION_CONCURRENTLY for non-temporary relations though, as a
partition tree can be temporary as long as all its members are
temporary.
--
Michael