Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200826052059.hvscf7ndf7g4673q@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Handing off SLRU fsyncs to the checkpointer
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2020-08-26 15:58:14 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote: > > --12.51%--compactify_tuples > > PageRepairFragmentation > > heap2_redo > > StartupXLOG > > I wonder if there is something higher level that could be done to > reduce the amount of compaction work required in the first place, but > in the meantime I'm very happy if we can improve the situation so much > with such a microscopic improvement that might eventually benefit > other sorting stuff... Another approach could be to not perform any sorting during recovery, instead including enough information in the WAL record to avoid doing a full blown PageRepairFragmentation during recovery. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: