Re: EDB builds Postgres 13 with an obsolete ICU version
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EDB builds Postgres 13 with an obsolete ICU version |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200818151327.GC27231@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EDB builds Postgres 13 with an obsolete ICU version (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:38:38AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:24 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > Not necessarily. It's likely that not all indexes use ICU collations, and > you still save time loading what may be large amounts of data. > > I agree though, that it *could* be slow. > > I agree it definitely could, but I'm not sure I see any case where it would > actually be slower than the alternative (which would be dump/reload). Well, given that pg_upgrade is more complex to run than pg_dump/reload, you then have to weigh the complexity of using pg_upgrade with index rebuild vs. the simpler pg_dump. Right now, you know pg_upgrade in link mode is going to be fast, but with the reindex, you have a much more complex decision to make. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: