Re: pg_resetwal --next-transaction-id may cause database failed to restart.
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_resetwal --next-transaction-id may cause database failed to restart. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200709051835.GA8638@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_resetwal --next-transaction-id may cause database failed to restart. ("movead.li@highgo.ca" <movead.li@highgo.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Jul-09, movead.li@highgo.ca wrote: > >> ISTM that a reasonable compromise is that if you use -x (or -c, -m, -O) > >> and the input value is outside the range supported by existing files, > >> then it's a fatal error; unless you use --force, which turns it into > >> just a warning. > > >One potential problem is that you might be using --force for some > >other reason and end up forcing this, too. But maybe that's OK. > Yes it's true, so I try to add a new option to control this behavior, you > can see it in the last mail with attach. It may be OK actually; if you're doing multiple dangerous changes, you'd use --dry-run beforehand ... No? (It's what *I* would do, for sure.) Which in turns suggests that it would good to ensure that --dry-run *also* emits a warning (not an error, so that any other warnings can also be thrown and the user gets the full picture). I think adding multiple different --force switches makes the UI more complex for little added value. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: