Re: pg_bsd_indent compiles bytecode
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_bsd_indent compiles bytecode |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200627211456.GH16644@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_bsd_indent compiles bytecode (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 05:12:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 05:56:10PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> I just noticed that when you compile pg_bsd_indent with a PG tree that > >> has --enable-jit (or something around that), then it compiles the source > >> files into bytecode. > >> Obviously this is not harmful since these files don't get installed, but > >> I wonder if our compiles aren't being excessively generous. > > > Are you saying pg_bsd_indent indents the JIT output files? I assumed > > people only ran pg_bsd_indent on dist-clean trees. > > I think what he means is that when pg_bsd_indent absorbs the CFLAGS > settings that PG uses (because it uses the pgxs build infrastructure), > it ends up also building .bc files. Wow, OK, I was confused then. > I wouldn't care about this particularly for pg_bsd_indent itself, > but it suggests that we're probably building .bc files for client-side > files, which seems like a substantial waste of time. Maybe we need > different CFLAGS for client and server? Understood. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: