Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
От | Kyotaro Horiguchi |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200615.172934.587211238374081803.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes. ("Andrey V. Lepikhov" <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Asynchronous Append on postgres_fdw nodes.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for testing, but.. At Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:51:23 +0500, "Andrey V. Lepikhov" <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote in > The patch has a problem with partitionwise aggregates. > > Asynchronous append do not allow the planner to use partial > aggregates. Example you can see in attachment. I can't understand why: > costs of partitionwise join are less. > Initial script and explains of the query with and without the patch > you can see in attachment. I had more or less the same plan with the second one without the patch (that is, vanilla master/HEAD, but used merge joins instead). I'm not sure what prevented join pushdown, but the difference between the two is whether the each partitionwise join is pushed down to remote or not, That is hardly seems related to the async execution patch. Could you tell me how did you get the first plan? regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: