Re: significant slowdown of HashAggregate between 9.6 and 10
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: significant slowdown of HashAggregate between 9.6 and 10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200605015758.p64bz3srqi2a3pqr@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: significant slowdown of HashAggregate between 9.6 and 10 (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: significant slowdown of HashAggregate between 9.6 and 10
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2020-06-04 18:22:03 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-04 at 11:41 -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > +/* minimum number of initial hash table buckets */ > > +#define HASHAGG_MIN_BUCKETS 256 > > > > > > I don't really see much explanation for that part in the commit, > > perhaps > > Jeff can chime in? > > I did this in response to a review comment (point #5): > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200219191636.gvdywx32kwbix6kd@development > > Tomas suggested a min of 1024, and I thought I was being more > conservative choosing 256. Still too high, I guess? > I can lower it. What do you think is a reasonable minimum? I don't really see why there needs to be a minimum bigger than 1? Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: