Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200521071716.GM2355@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 08:49:53AM +0200, Julien Rouhaud wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 4:29 AM Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com> wrote: >> Thanks for the excellent extension. I want to add 5 more fields to satisfy the >> following requirements. >> >> int subplan; /* No. of subplan in this query */ >> int subquery; /* No. of subquery */ >> int joincnt; /* How many relations are joined */ >> bool hasagg; /* if we have agg function in this query */ >> bool hasgroup; /* has group clause */ > > Most of those fields can be computed using the raw sql satements. Why > not adding functions like query_has_agg(querytext) to get the > information from pgss stored query text instead? Yeah I personally find concepts related only to the query string itself not something that needs to be tied to pg_stat_statements. While reading about those five new fields, I am also wondering how this stuff would work with CTEs. Particularly, should the hasagg or hasgroup flags be set only if the most outer query satisfies a condition? What if an inner query satisfies a condition but not an outer query? Should joincnt just be the sum of all the joins done in all queries, including subqueries? -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: