Re: Missing comma?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing comma? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200514000738.GA166343@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing comma? (Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing comma?
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 05:17:43PM +0300, Marina Polyakova wrote: > in my opinion it's a little unclear what "or default" means at the end, > because the comma is used to separate enumeration elements ("d = default > <...>, n = nothing, f = all columns, i = index <...>") and inside the > element description ("i = index with indisreplident set, or default"). > Therefore here is an additional patch from me to clarify this place, thanks > to Alexander Lakhin for help. Yes, I agree that this last "or default" in the docs does not make much sense, because we always enforce REPLICA_IDENTITY_NOTHING if there is no replica identity. > diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml > index 02ddebae99d98110a8dd290dd4cb0c980adf7984..034a08f80ea4269f131e7e1383ba482fd76d9344 100644 > --- a/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml > +++ b/doc/src/sgml/catalogs.sgml > @@ -1936,7 +1936,7 @@ SCRAM-SHA-256$<replaceable><iteration count></replaceable>:<replaceable>&l > <literal>d</literal> = default (primary key, if any), > <literal>n</literal> = nothing, > <literal>f</literal> = all columns, > - <literal>i</literal> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set, or default > + <literal>i</literal> = index with <structfield>indisreplident</structfield> set (if any) > </entry> > </row> And you don't need the ("if any") either here, no? REPLICA_IDENTITY_INDEX means that we have an index associated with the replica identity so it seems to me that this last part can just be removed. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: