Re: The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay shouldbe documented
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay shouldbe documented |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200512214014.GD4666@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay should be documented (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: The suggestion of reducing autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay shouldbe documented
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:26:27AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > The following documentation comment has been logged on the website: > > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/runtime-config-autovacuum.html > Description: > > The `autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay` setting changes to 2ms in PostgreSQL 12 > but in the old Postgresql version, the default setting is still 20ms. I > would suggest adding a suggestion in the old document > to lower the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay as: > > > The default value of autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay is reduced to 2ms in > PostgreSQL 12. Reducing the autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay will make the > autovacuum more aggressive and might reduce the vacuum cost for > write-intensive workload on big table. Uh, we usually don't suggest new defaults in back branches. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: