Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200423162302.GA4210@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:04:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > I've played with this a bit, and there are certainly a lot of > > interesting things that you can do with CSS nowadays that would preserve > > some semblance of semantic markup on both the DocBook side and the HTML > > side. > > As I said, I'm happy to do the legwork of improving the markup if someone > will point me in the right direction. But I know next to zip about CSS, > so it would not be productive for me to do the basic design there --- > it would take too long and there would probably still be lots to criticize > in whatever I came up with. I can do the CSS if you tell me what you want. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: