Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200420213140.GA29785@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Apr-20, Tom Lane wrote: > Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com> writes: > > While table 9.5 with functions looks quite nice, I quite dislike 9.4 with > > operators. > > Previously, I could lookup operator in the leftmost column and read on. > > Right now I have to look through the whole table (well, not really, but > > still) to find the operator. > > Aside from the alternatives already discussed, There's one with a separate column for the operator, without types, at the left (the "with names" example at https://postgr.es/m/14380.1587242177@sss.pgh.pa.us ). That seemed pretty promising -- not sure why it was discarded. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: