Re: pgsql: dummy commit

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 05:34:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > dummy commit
> 
> Uh, what?
> 
> Also, I disagree with your change of the wording about savepoint
> rollbacks.  I agree that "if the savepoint is rolled back to"
> is a bit awkward, but I think dropping the "to" is flat wrong.
> The savepoint is a point you roll back to, it doesn't itself
> disappear when you do so.  That's why the SQL syntax is
> "ROLLBACK TO savepoint" and not just "ROLLBACK savepoint".

OK, I will re-add the "to".

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        https://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             https://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I.  As I am, so you will be. +
+                      Ancient Roman grave inscription +