Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROMand DELETE USING
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROMand DELETE USING |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200318162445.GG17915@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROM and DELETE USING (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROM and DELETE USING
Re: Small docs bugfix: make it clear what can be used in UPDATE FROMand DELETE USING |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:58:54PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > I have implemented the ideas above in the attached patch. I have > > synchronized the syntax to match SELECT, and synchronized the paragraphs > > describing the item. > > I think that the DELETE synopsis should look like > > [ USING <replaceable class="parameter">from_item</replaceable> [, ...] ] > > so that there's not any question which part of the SELECT syntax we're > talking about. I also think that the running text in both cases should > say in exactly these words "from_item means the same thing as it does > in SELECT"; the wording you propose still seems to be dancing around > the point, leaving readers perhaps not quite sure about what is meant. > > In the DELETE case you could alternatively say "using_item means the same > thing as from_item does in SELECT", but that doesn't really seem like an > improvement to me. OK, updated patch attached. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: