Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200317001436.GA17904@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Adding missing object access hook invocations (Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding missing object access hook invocations
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Mar-16, Mark Dilger wrote: > Hackers, > > While working on object access hooks, I noticed several locations where I would expect the hook to be invoked, but no actualinvocation. I think this just barely qualifies as a bug. It's debatable because whether it is a bug depends on theuser's expectations and whether not invoking the hook in these cases is defensible. Does anybody have any recollectionof an intentional choice not to invoke in these locations? Hmm, possibly the create-time calls are missing. I'm surprised about the InvokeObjectDropHook calls though. Doesn't deleteOneObject already call that? If we have more calls elsewhere, maybe they are redundant. I think we should only have those for "shared" objects. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: