Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction
От | Justin Pryzby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed atend-of-transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200308191456.GD1357@telsasoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg11+: pg_ls_*dir LIMIT 1: temporary files .. not closed at end-of-transaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 02:37:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes: > > While working on a patch, I noticed this pre-existing behavior, which seems to > > be new since v11, maybe due to changes to SRF. > > > |postgres=# SELECT pg_ls_dir('.') LIMIT 1; > > |WARNING: 1 temporary files and directories not closed at end-of-transaction > > Hmm, actually it looks to me like pg_ls_dir has been broken forever. > The reason the warning didn't show up before v11 is that CleanupTempFiles > didn't bleat about leaked "allocated" directories before that > (cf 9cb7db3f0). > > I guess we ought to change that function to use returns-a-tuplestore > protocol instead of thinking it can hold a directory open across calls. > It's not hard to think of use-cases where the existing behavior would > cause issues worse than a nanny-ish WARNING, especially on platforms > with tight "ulimit -n" limits. Thanks for the analysis. Do you mean it should enumerate all files during the initial SRF call, or use something other than the SRF_* macros ? -- Justin
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: