Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line
От | Alvaro Herrera |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200306020906.GA11931@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command fromrecovery.conf or command line
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Mar-06, Michael Paquier wrote: > I was also thinking to split the patch into two pieces: > - Introduction of common/archive.c and common/fe_archive.c (the former > is used by xlogarchive.c and the latter only by pg_rewind). The > latter is dead code without the second patch, but this would validate > the MSVC build with the buildfarm. > - The pg_rewind pieces with the new option. Hmm, doesn't the CF bot already validate the MSVC build? Splitting in two seems all right, but I think one commit that introduces dead code is not great. It may make more sense to have one commit for common/archive.c, and a second commit that does fe_archive plus pg_rewind changes ... If that doesn't work for whatever reason, then doing a single commit may be preferrable. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: