Re: Back-patching -Wno-format-truncation.

At Tue, 03 Mar 2020 18:44:16 -0500, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote in 
> Uh ... it sure looks to me like they were back-patched as advertised.
> Do you not have these back-branch commits?
> 
> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Branch: master Release: REL_11_BR [e71658523] 2018-06-16 15:34:07 -0400
> Branch: REL_10_STABLE Release: REL_10_5 [416e3e318] 2018-06-16 15:34:07 -0400
> Branch: REL9_6_STABLE Release: REL9_6_10 [119290be6] 2018-06-16 15:34:07 -0400
> Branch: REL9_5_STABLE Release: REL9_5_14 [14b69a532] 2018-06-16 15:34:07 -0400
> Branch: REL9_4_STABLE Release: REL9_4_19 [817d605e4] 2018-06-16 15:34:07 -0400
> Branch: REL9_3_STABLE Release: REL9_3_24 [ec5547e56] 2018-06-16 15:34:07 -0400
> 
>     Use -Wno-format-truncation and -Wno-stringop-truncation, if available.
> 
> Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Branch: master Release: REL_11_BR [5d923eb29] 2018-06-16 14:45:47 -0400
> Branch: REL_10_STABLE Release: REL_10_5 [189332615] 2018-06-16 14:45:47 -0400
> Branch: REL9_6_STABLE Release: REL9_6_10 [8870e2978] 2018-06-16 14:45:47 -0400
> Branch: REL9_5_STABLE Release: REL9_5_14 [f3be5d3e7] 2018-06-16 14:45:47 -0400
> Branch: REL9_4_STABLE Release: REL9_4_19 [fd079dd09] 2018-06-16 14:45:47 -0400
> Branch: REL9_3_STABLE Release: REL9_3_24 [3243cbc08] 2018-06-16 14:45:47 -0400
> 
>     Use snprintf not sprintf in pg_waldump's timestamptz_to_str.

Mmm... I should have created my working trees from stale tracking
branches. I confirmed that they are surely there. Sorry for the bogus
report and thanks for the reply.

regards.

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center