Re: postgres feature matrix

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:53:49PM -0500, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
> Please feel free to use my own made up description of the patch:
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix/detail/332/
..
> https://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix/detail/320/

It seems to me these would more naturally live under "Partitioning" rather than
the oversized "performance".

Also, regarding the item named "Table partitioning", it seems to me that's
unclear/ambiguous/misleading.  It's probably been there since pre-v10, and so
it's referring to any type of table heirarchy/inheritance.  I think it should
be renamed, or just removed.

Note commit 0c06534bd6, which is semi-relevant.  Quoting my description:
| I made changes to avoid "partition" (which I think should mean a child of
| relkind='p', and itself of relkind='r') and "partitioned" (meaning relkind='p'
| itself) but left alone most instances of "partitioning".

-- 
Justin