Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20200214152926.GA7006@alvherre.pgsql обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent (John Naylor <john.naylor@2ndquadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: assert pg_class.relnatts is consistent
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-Feb-14, John Naylor wrote:
> One possible objection to what I wrote above is that it adds a
> different kind of special case, but in a sneaky way. Perhaps it would
> be more principled to treat it the same as oid after all. If we do
> that, it would help to add a comment that we can't treat relnatts like
> pronangs, since we need more information than what's in each pg_class
> row.
How about something like this? (untested)
# oids are a special case; ignore
next if $attname eq 'oid';
# pg_class.relnatts is computed from pg_attribute rows; ignore
next if $catname eq 'pg_class' and $attname eq 'relnatts';
# Raise error unless a value exists.
die "strip_default_values: $catname.$attname undefined\n"
if !defined $row->{$attname};
--
Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: