Re: Users/Roles do not align.
От | Stephen Frost |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Users/Roles do not align. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200205183005.GX3195@tamriel.snowman.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Users/Roles do not align. (Jürgen Purtz <juergen@purtz.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Users/Roles do not align.
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
Greetings, * Jürgen Purtz (juergen@purtz.de) wrote: > >Based on this, I believe Section 5.9 should read: > >`A PostgreSQL database cluster contains one or more named databases. Roles > >are shared across the entire cluster, but no other data is shared across > >databases. Any given client connection to the server can access only the > >data in a single database, the one specified in the connection request.` > > imo the following is a more precise wording: > > 'A cluster contains three or more named databases ('template0', 'template1', > 'postgres', ...). Roles, which are users or groups, see Chapter 21, - as Roles aren't 'users or groups', they're roles, and we don't actually have users or groups today. > well as database names and tablespace definitions - are shared across the > entire cluster. No other data is shared across databases or schemas. Any > given client connection to the server can access only the data in a single > database, the one specified in the connection request. If it has the > necessary privileges, the connection can access all schemas within this > database.' There's a few things wrong about this part anyway- namely that we've got FDWs now, and there's certainly other cluster-wide things that exist beyond the specific items listed, so I wonder if perhaps we should just stop trying to list everything here. The description given in 22.1 seems like it's a lot better since it talks about the hierarchy in a general sense. The minimalistic approach suggested initially seems like it might be the best answer to this right now. Thanks, Stephen
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: