Re: Decade indication
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Decade indication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200117225201.GC14054@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Decade indication (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Decade indication
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 08:52:17AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > > On Wed, Jan 1, 2020 at 11:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> I see Randall Munroe has weighed in on this topic: > >> https://xkcd.com/2249/ > > > And the conclusion is ... the whole discussion is stupid? > > Well, it's not terribly useful anyway. Arguments founded on an > assumption that there's anything rational or consistent about > human calendars tend to run into problems with that assumption. I assume there is enough agreement that decades start on 20X0 that we don't need to document that Postgres does that. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: