Re: Remove libpq.rc, use win32ver.rc for libpq
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove libpq.rc, use win32ver.rc for libpq |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200115064438.GJ2243@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove libpq.rc, use win32ver.rc for libpq (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove libpq.rc, use win32ver.rc for libpq
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 02:22:45PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > At Tue, 14 Jan 2020 22:34:10 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote in >> On 2020-01-09 10:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >>> Note that there is FILEFLAGSMASK and FILEFLAGS. The first is just a >>> mask that says which bits in the second are valid. Since both >>> libpq.rc >>> and win32ver.rc use FILEFLAGS 0, it doesn't matter what we set >>> FILEFLAGSMASK to. But currently libpq.rc uses 0x3fL and win32ver.rc >>> uses 0x17L, so in order to unify this sensibly I looked for a >>> well-recognized standard value, which led to VS_FFI_FILEFLAGSMASK. Hmm. I agree that what you have here is sensible. I am wondering if it would be better to have VS_FF_DEBUG set dynamically in FILEFLAGS in the future though. But that's no material for this patch. >> Here is a rebased patch. > > It applied on 4d8a8d0c73 cleanly and built successfully by VS2019. I have been testing and checking the patch a bit more seriously, and the information gets generated correctly for dlls and exe files. The rest of the changes look fine to me. For src/makefiles/Makefile.win32, I don't have a MinGW environment at hand so I have not directly tested but the logic looks fine. -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: