Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20195.1251208217@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS
Re: DELETE syntax on JOINS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> What I don't get is why this is such a usability issue. �Subqueries in >> DELETE FROM work perfectly well, and provide more flexibility than most >> users know what to do with. > It's both a usability issue and a performance issue. On the usability front: if we were to take the position Josh advocates, we should never have added FROM/USING to UPDATE/DELETE at all ... but since we did, I think we should try to make it as flexible as the corresponding feature in other DBMSes. On the performance front: yeah, you can recast most joins as subqueries, but you tend to end up with the equivalent of a nestloop plan. Works okay for small numbers of rows, scales horribly. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: