Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: global / super barriers (for checksums) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20191212195420.wjxczsxcszd5pubb@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: global / super barriers (for checksums) (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: global / super barriers (for checksums)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On 2019-12-11 13:35:26 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: > While I have passionate philosophical feelings about this topic, for > purposes of the present thread the really important question (IMV, > anyway) is whether there's any way of getting a patch for global > barriers committed in advance of the first user of such barriers. Right. I think there is. > If not, then I guess we'll need to decide which of checksum > enable/disable and ALTER SYSTEM READ ONLY is going to go first and > commit this only when that patch is ready to go as well. Or, I > suppose, commit it with a dummy placeholder that then gets replaced by > whichever patch goes first, but I'm not sure whether people would be > OK with that. I'd either add a test (if we have some) or placeholder kind initially. But I'd also be ok with going for either of the other versions directly - but it seems harder to tackle the patches together. Greetings, Andres Freund
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: