Re: monitoring-stats.html is too impenetrable
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: monitoring-stats.html is too impenetrable |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20191125012036.GC37821@paquier.xyz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | monitoring-stats.html is too impenetrable (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: monitoring-stats.html is too impenetrable
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Sun, Nov 24, 2019 at 09:31:58AM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: > There needs to be a tutorial page explaining how to use pg_stat_all_tables > to find missing indexes, or maybe just an example on monitoring-stats.html > which is hopelessly inaccessible to a non-expert. I would have never been > able to figure out anything close to the solution at > https://www.reddit.com/r/PostgreSQL/comments/e0rx8l/i_was_missing_a_single_index_and_omgf_everything/ > from the existing docs. Well, it may be as simple as that in some cases, but you also need to consider other parameters in more complex cases, like: - Actual CPU consumption done by backends. - Get stats about predicates (WHERE and JOIN clauses). - Physical disk access. - Anything else I don't have on top of my mind. > Thank you for your kind consideration of this > request; please do not hesitate to send instructions for how to submit a > pull request for this, as I would gladly do so. Best regards, -Jim The Postgres mailing lists are old-school regarding that, so pull requests sent to the git repository on github or such are not accepted. Sending an email with a patch would be just but fine, and here you would need to patch some of the *.sgml files in doc/. So if you have anything you'd like to get changed with fresh ideas, let's see how you would like things to change and then let's discuss about it. Thanks, -- Michael
Вложения
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: