Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker
От | Ondřej Jirman |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20191121173717.fgzkrqejqhig54s4@core.my.home обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16129: Segfault in tts_virtual_materialize in logicalreplication worker (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 06:01:52PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:35:06PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 05:09:06PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:57:07PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:27:32PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 04:07:16PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote: > > > > > > I've also managed to get valgrind output on the segfaulting process: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://megous.com/dl/tmp/valgrind-105524-109020.log > > > > > > > > > > > > Though it probably doesn't show much new. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is postgres actually compiled with valgrind support? What does pg_config > > > > > say? > > > > > > > > I don't see any valgrind related options in configure --help, I repackaged it > > > > just with CFLAGS set to -ggdb -Og. > > > > > > > > > > You need to use -DUSE_VALGRIND or edit pg_config_manual.h. I usually > > > just use > > > > > > CFLAGS="-DRANDOMIZE_ALLOCATED_MEMORY -DUSE_VALGRIND -O0 -ggdb" > > > > > > which does the trick. Without the USE_VALGRIND defined, we don't include > > > the valgrind instrumentation, so I suppose the previous results are bogus. > > > > Two new valgrind logs, now with -DUSE_VALGRIND: > > > > https://megous.com/dl/tmp/valgrind-172090.log > > https://megous.com/dl/tmp/valgrind-172143.log > > > > Unfortunately, I only get HTTP 403 :-( Sorry for that, it should be accessible now. > > A lots of uninitialized 1b accesses around VARATT_IS_EXTERNAL_EXPANDED. > > > > So slot->tts_values[natt] is probably uninitialized. > > > > Which is why the backtrace had a weird value there, I guess. > > > > Possibly. Something is clearly wrong. > > > regards > > -- > Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: