Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20191107212750.GB487@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: The word "virgin" used incorrectly and probably better offreplaced
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 07:55:22PM +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: > > On 7 Nov 2019, at 16:03, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > because we have not explained what a "virgin database" is. > > I think this is the key observation. > > > We could say "empty", which seems better suited than both "virgin" and > > "pristine" anyway. > > empty is a lot better, but still isn't conveying the state of the database > without there being room for interpretation. (My grasp of the english language > isn't enough to suggest a better alternative however). I am thinking "pristine" would be a good word here. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: