Hi,
On 2019-11-06 07:53:09 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> As per feedback in this thread, it seems that for now, it is better,
> if we can allow a parallel vacuum only when I/O throttling is not
> enabled. We can later extend it based on feedback from the field once
> the feature starts getting used.
That's not my read on this thread. I don't think we should introduce
this feature without a solution for the throttling.
Greetings,
Andres Freund